We're here to help you with your Road Traffic Accident Injury Claim
Claims Against Children Who Cause Accidents
The number of children who are killed or seriously injured on Britain’s roads has fortunately been dropping for many years and this is mainly due to road safety initiatives. However, too many are still being involved in road traffic accidents, which causes distress and heartbreak not only for the children’s families, but also for the drivers/riders of the vehicles involved.
As children have the independent ability to walk out into the middle of a busy street, it is likely accidents will happen as a result. Those accidents can impact on drivers of vehicle, cyclists and pedestrians. So, what liability do the children or their parents have?
Solicitors often assume a parent is liable for the conduct of a child, when a child is involved in or causes an accident. However, this is not always the case. A parent is under a duty to exercise reasonable control over their children. The younger the child, the greater the level of control would normally be expected. If the child is on an errand for a parent, then the parent may also be liable for their conduct. But provided the parent exercises reasonable control and the child is not acting as their "servant or agent" then the parent has no responsibility for the child's actions.
A child is regarded as a vulnerable road user and as such other road users are under a higher duty of care when they see children, to anticipate that they may act irrationally or in an unsafe manner because of their age. The ordinary tests of responsibility for an accident do not apply as a result. There is an automatic shifting of the duty to take care towards the adult. This means that liability is not as clear cut as most lawyers think either.
Children under the age of 10 are unlikely to have any responsibility if an accident occurs. Children between the ages of 10 and 14 are regarded as more responsible, whereas children over the age of 14 are usually treated the same as adults.
The courts have previously recognised "red flag" instances where drivers should be taking particular care. Obvious examples would be near a school, near an ice cream van or in residential areas. Drivers often forget that the speed limit is the legally recognised maximum safe speed limit, and does not automatically mean it is safe to travel at that speed.
There is slight solace in the fact that most children are covered under their parent's house insurance policy against any claim. What is important is specialist advice at an early stage. This is particularly because you should not be issuing a claim against a child without them having a "litigation friend" (usually a parent) appointed on their behalf.
How can Routh Clarke help you?
This area of Personal Injury claims requires a great deal of sensitivity, as it may unfortunately involve a child who has been seriously injured or worse. Nick Routh has a great deal of experience in dealing with road traffic accidents caused by children and understands that it requires tact and sensitivity in gathering evidence and perseverance to bring the claim to fruition, so why not call him today for a no-obligation chat about your accident.